Busting myths of financial service firm independence

Most financial services firms tout their independence and how they are always looking to do what is in the best interests of their clients. But the truth, of course, isn't so simple.
Let's start by busting a few myths about adviser independence. First may be the myth that because someone practices as a fee-only adviser that they are completely independent. In theory, of course that would be true. But in practice, I've seen independent fee-only advisers whose independence may be compromised because of limited product knowledge or using the same cast of characters for commission business or other services without offering a choice of others who may be equally or more competent.

Next is the myth that an adviser who earns commissions is not independent. This may or may not be true. The best way for an adviser compensated by commissions to be independent is to represent and evaluate every possible product or company for client solutions and to fully disclose any compensation from the use of that product.

There are a few different levels of independence. Beyond the whole issue of the commission itself, the next issue is what products or services are offered by an adviser's firm. For example, if an independent company only represents a few companies in any given area, is the adviser or that firm truly independent? I would argue not.

If the solutions presented to you always have the same brand name, there is a good possibility that your adviser is not acting independently. It is very difficult, if not impossible, for any one company to manufacture the best in class for the entire range of financial products. Ask to see some alternatives if you want to test this.

Many financial firms tout themselves as financial planners when in reality they are product salesman using a consultative selling process that mimics comprehensive financial planning.

This does not mean that all commission-based financial firms mask their true intentions behind the cloak of financial planning, but specifically ask if a written financial plan will be prepared for you. I don't mean pages of numbers and forecasts. I mean a document written in plain English that spells out your situation, goals and objectives, alternatives and specific recommendations. Be very direct and ask specifically if an adviser will put their advice in writing.

John P. Napolitano is CEO of U.S. Wealth Management in Braintree, Mass., and 2012 president of the Financial Planning Association of Massachusetts. He may be reached at jnap@uswealthcompanies.com or on Facebook as JohnPNapolitano and US Wealth

Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advice offered through U.S. Financial Advisors, a registered investment advisor and separate entity from LPL Financial. The LPL Financial Registered Representatives associated with this site may only discuss and/or transact securities business with resident of the following states: AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MN, NC, ND, NH, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WV. USFA, and U.S. Insurance Brokers, LLC are wholly-owned subsidiaries of U.S. Wealth Management. U.S. Wealth Management companies are not affiliated with LPL Financial.

The information being provided is strictly as a courtesy. When you link to any of the web sites provided here, you are leaving this web site. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these web sites. Nor is the company liable for any direct or indirect technical or system issues or any consequences arising out of your access to or your use of third-party technologies, web sites, information and programs made available through this web site. When you access one of these web sites, you are leaving our web site and assume total responsibility and risk for your use of the web sites you are linking to.